By Dale Jacquette
This choice of newly comissioned essays by means of foreign members bargains a consultant review of an important advancements in modern philosophical logic.
- Presents controversies in philosophical implications and purposes of formal symbolic logic.
- Surveys significant developments and gives unique insights.
Read or Download A Companion to Philosophical Logic PDF
Best logic & language books
Presumption is a remarkably flexible and pervasively resource. Firmly grounded within the legislation of proof from its origins in classical antiquity, it made its method within the days of medieval scholasticism into the speculation and perform of disputation and debate. for that reason, it prolonged its achieve to play an more and more major position within the philosophical conception of information.
Paraconsistent good judgment is a concept of reasoning in philosophy that reports inconsistent information. The self-discipline has a number of various faculties of concept, together with preservationism, which responds to the issues that come up whilst humans proceed to cause whilst confronted with inconsistent facts. On conserving is the 1st whole account of the Preservationist tuition, which constructed in Canada out of the early paintings of Raymond Jennings, Peter Schotch, and their scholars.
Terence Parsons provides a brand new examine of the improvement and logical complexity of medieval good judgment. simple rules of good judgment have been utilized by Aristotle to end up conversion rules and decrease syllogisms. Medieval logicians accelerated Aristotle's notation in numerous methods, equivalent to quantifying predicate phrases, as in 'No donkey is each animal', and permitting singular phrases to seem in predicate place, as in 'Not each donkey is Brownie'; with the enlarged notation come extra logical rules.
- Something to reckon with: The logic of terms
- A Logic Book: Fundamentals of Reasoning
- Philosophical Knowledge. Its Possibility and Scope (Grazer Philosophische Studien 74) (Grazer Philosophische Studien)
- Introducción a la Lógica Formal
- Dependence Logic: Theory and Applications
- Methods in Mathematical Logic
Additional resources for A Companion to Philosophical Logic
Both the Stoics and Aristotle, then, investigated logical modalities in order to reconcile logical theory with their views about determinism. ’ Aristotle, who rejects universal necessitarianism and develops a complex theory of potentialities to accommodate his views on motion and deliberation, at least recognizes that his position will require some radical modification of his logical theory. ) 6 Sentential Logic in Aristotle and Afterwards Aristotle never developed an account of sentential logic (the inferences that rest on sentential operators such as ‘and,’ ‘or,’ ‘if,’ ‘not’).
For beaten tracks lead this sort of cattle . . not where we ought to go, but where we have been. 7) The “cattle,” poor drudges who taught logic to undergraduates, struck back by proposing to ban Locke’s Essay from Oxford, since “there was a great decay of logical exercises . . which could not be attributed to anything so much as the new philosophy, which was too much read” (Cranston 1957: 465ff). Hume continued Locke’s attack: “Our scholastic headpieces shew no . . 15). Denis Diderot’s article on logic in the Encyclopédie, the most widely consulted reference work of the century, claimed that reasoning is a natural ability; to conduct logical inquiries is like “setting oneself the task of dissecting the human leg in order to learn how to walk” (Encyclopédie, Logique).
The unusual triadic construction of consequence also allows for enthymemes, or partly ‘material’ consequences, where only a subset of extralogical terms is varied. For example, in the argument ‘All men are mortal, therefore Socrates is mortal,’ any substitution on ‘mortal’ that makes the premise true makes the conclusion true: though not a logical consequence, it is valid with respect to ‘mortal’ (cf. George 1983). Most logic texts of the period claimed, without supporting argument, that the so-called ‘laws of thought’ (identity, contradiction, and excluded middle) are the basic principles, the foundation on which all logic rests.
A Companion to Philosophical Logic by Dale Jacquette